Results of validating PECO using OOPS and FOOPS

[inaja]

I know I should have done this before creating the release, but here we are:

1. OOPS
   1.1. Important:
   1.1.1. Missing disjointness
   1.1.2. Missing domain or range: these are only for the sosa properties, not for any of our properties
   1.2. Minor
   1.2.1. Unconnected elements: prov:Activity, prov:Entity, foaf:Organization, sosa: Result, and sosa:Sensor,
   1.2.2. Missing annotations: 13 missing but all of them are the imported concepts
   1.2.3. Missing explicit declaration of inverse relationshipts: 8 cases, 2 are peco: inEmissionActivityContext and hasEmissionScore. the rest are sosa and qudt relationships
   1.2.4.URI contains file extension
2. FOOPS
   2.1. Findable:
   2.1.1. OM1: Minimum metadata: The following metadata was not found: author (we have creator)
   2.1.1. FIND3: Ontology in metadata registry: Ontology not found in a public registry
   2.2. Accessible
   2.2.1: FIND_3_BIS: Ontology not found in a public registry (would be solved along witl 2.1.1)
   2.3. Interoperable: all good
   2.4. Reusable:
   2.4.1 Missing recommended metadata: citation and contributor.
   2.4.2. Missing detailed metadata: doi, publisher, logo, status, source, issued, backwards compatibility
   2.4.3. Missing basic provenance metadata: author and contributor (same as 2.2.1, we have creator)
   2.4.4. Missing detailed provenance metadata: issued, publisher

[dgarijo]

ok, these are recommendations, but I think we are mostly good to go:

• From OOPS we are getting those because of the missing classes because we are extending instead of importing. No further action needed.
• I added both peco and ecfo in prefix.cc.
• I also suggested them in LOV (waiting)
• Missing metadata, we can include citation (I think I did in ecfo) and publised date or similar. We don't have an official publisher though.

[dgarijo]

Decisions: publisher should be the github organization TEC.
We now have the ontology in LOV. Add schema:includedInDataCatalog https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/peco

[inaja]

Update on FOOPS which is now 98%

1. Findable: all good
2. Accessible: all good
3. Interoperable: all good
4. Reusable: 8.42/9
   4.1 Missing recommended metadata: citation. also optionally contributor.
   4.2. Missing detailed metadata: doi and source. also optionally backwards compatibility
   4.3. Missing basic optional provenance metadata: contributor