As pointed out by a reviewer of the 2025 paper, It could be beneficial to provide site and/or rupture locations (if given as input) in the returned flatfile, as well as the predictions used to compute the residuals (only the latter are returned by default).
important In my opinion this is questionable enhancement, as everything returned in the residual table aligns with the input flatfile row-wise (i.e., N-th row of the residuals refers to the N-th in the original flatfile), users can get whatever they has as input in 1 line of code, with no need for a feature that might add complexity to the data and relative documentation.