toNano(1e-7) produces inadequate result

[mcnckc]

toNano(1e-6) works fine but
toNano(1e-7).toNumber() results in 2377000000000 on my machine.
It seems like it is exactly the reason why one can't send less than 1e-6 TON using the web wallet based on this library - https://ton.app/wallets/web-ton-wallet.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but by the standard one should be able to send less than 1000 nanoTON, despite it doesn't seem like a critical issue.
I know that the average fee is much greater.

[slavafomin]

We are on it, thank you for reporting this!

[slavafomin]

I've created an upstream issue: ethjs/ethjs-unit#6.

[slavafomin]

Fixed in the upstream library: ethjs/ethjs-unit#7.

[tolya-yanot]

@mcnckc thanks for the report! This is a bug in the ethjs-unit that tonweb is using. Fixed in tonweb 0.0.42.

Since using Numbers in a crypto is basically a bad practice, in version 0.0.42, in addition to fixing the ethjs-unit, we forbade passing Numbers as an argument at all.

Please pass numbers as strings or BN objects.

This breaks backwards compatibility a bit, but I think it's a good idea to allow developers to avoid precision bugs.

[EmelyanenkoK]

@mcnckc please contact @ton_bugs_bot to get bounty reward

[Afz85]

Afz185

[Afz85]

Afzaalmaher330@gmail.com