Sourcery refactored main branch

[sourcery-ai]

Branch main refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the main branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/main
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Function Player.update refactored with the following changes:

• Replace if statement with if expression (assign-if-exp)
• Swap if/else branches (swap-if-else-branches)
• Merge else clause's nested if statement into elif (merge-else-if-into-elif)

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.34%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	35.54 ⛔	34.66 ⛔	-0.88 👍
Method Length	123.29 😞	123.12 😞	-0.17 👍
Working memory	14.34 😞	14.33 😞	-0.01 👍
Quality	32.39% 😞	32.73% 😞	0.34% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	335	331	-4

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
main.py	32.39% 😞	32.73% 😞	0.34% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
main.py	Player.update	51 ⛔	437 ⛔	15 😞	12.43% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
main.py	LoadLvL	17 🙂	368 ⛔	14 😞	29.26% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
main.py	Lrud.__init__	4 ⭐	240 ⛔	14 😞	45.21% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
main.py	Lrud.update	6 ⭐	69 🙂	11 😞	65.68% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
main.py	Player.__init__	0 ⭐	135 😞	9 🙂	66.64% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!