fix: rely on OS temp directory #486
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an issue to impose a `/tmp` as a default temporary directory, even thought this is the right one. On some case, you'd end up having a `/tmp` which is not writable (k8s: securityContext -> readOnlyRootFilesystem: true) and you'd prefer to have a way to override this.
render
bot
temporarily deployed
to
fix/rely_on_system_temp_directory - chproxy PR #486
mga-chka
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is an issue to impose a
/tmpas a default temporary directory, even thought this is the right one.On some case, you'd end up having a
/tmpwhich is not writable (k8s: securityContext -> readOnlyRootFilesystem: true) and you'd prefer to have a way to override this.Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
Checklist
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Further comments