{2023.06}[2023b] FEniCS 0.9.0 #1340

boegel · 2025-12-15T07:22:54Z

No description provided.

boegel · 2025-12-15T07:23:14Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-deucalion for:arch=aarch64/a64fx

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-12-15T07:23:21Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.12/pr_1340/113217

date	job status	comment
Dec 15 07:23:20 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `113217` awaits release by job manager
Dec 15 07:24:18 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Dec 15 07:31:21 UTC 2025	running	job `113217` is running
Dec 15 09:11:36 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-113217.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17657896990.tar.zst` size: 17 MiB (18072724 bytes) entries: 3358 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Dec 15 09:11:36 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 269.834 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 453.168 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 2.83 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 2.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 5.84 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 5.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.85 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.74 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6249.69 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6277.23 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-113217.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

eessi-bot-jsc · 2025-12-15T07:23:23Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2025.12/pr_1340/14305462

date	job status	comment
Dec 15 07:23:21 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `14305462` awaits release by job manager
Dec 15 07:23:56 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Dec 15 07:25:00 UTC 2025	running	job `14305462` is running
Dec 15 08:28:43 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14305462.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-17657868180.tar.gz` size: 17 MiB (18338094 bytes) entries: 3358 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace no other files in tarball
Dec 15 08:28:43 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=gpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1f2ca7c1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 7014.44 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 1541.104 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 1567.254 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /b22a48f5 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: perf: 1519.703 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 4.95 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 5.01 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 5.28 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 5.21 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 7.04 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 7.0 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 8.7 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 8.35 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.5 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.51 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: latency: 0.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 43062.23 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42300.92 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (27/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42426.75 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (28/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace+default P: bandwidth: 42135.22 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 20/28 test case(s) from 28 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14305462.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-12-15T07:23:24Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-deucalion for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: a64fx
Building for: aarch64/a64fx
Job dir: /home/eessibot/new-bot/jobs/2025.12/pr_1340/771904

date	job status	comment
Dec 15 07:23:22 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `771904` awaits release by job manager
Dec 15 07:24:21 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Dec 15 07:25:24 UTC 2025	running	job `771904` is running
Dec 15 10:14:30 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-771904.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-a64fx-17657932440.tar.zst` size: 16 MiB (17309590 bytes) entries: 3358 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/software `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/a64fx no other files in tarball
Dec 15 10:14:31 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 2/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 3/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ SKIP ] ( 4/10) Skipping test: nodes in this partition only have 30720 MiB memory available (per node) according to the current ReFrame configuration, but 49152 MiB is needed [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 575.881 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: perf: 572.812 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.66 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: latency: 1.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8839.1 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_a64fx+default P: bandwidth: 8727.37 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 6/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 4 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-771904.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

boegel · 2025-12-15T07:30:33Z

Won't work, need to make sure that spdlog easyconfig from easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#24400 is used to prevent this error for FEniCS-DOLFINx/0.9.0-foss-2023b:

/cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/EESSI-2023.06/software/spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0/lib/libspdlog.a(spdlog.cpp.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value

boegel · 2025-12-15T08:19:09Z

After installing the correct spdlog easyconfig, I'm hitting a different problem with FEniCS-DOLFINx-0.9.0-foss-2023b.eb:

-- The following OPTIONAL packages have not been found:

 * ADIOS2 (required version >= 2.8.1), Adaptable Input/Output (I/O) System., <https://adios2.readthedocs.io/en/latest/>
   IO, including in parallel
 * SCOTCH, Programs and libraries for graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning, <https://www.labri.fr/perso/pelegrin/scotch>
   Parallel graph partitioning
 * KaHIP, A family of graph partitioning programs, <https://kahip.github.io/>
   Parallel graph partitioning

-- The following RECOMMENDED packages have not been found:

 * ParMETIS (required version >= 4.0.2), Parallel Graph Partitioning and Fill-reducing Matrix Ordering, <http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/metis/parmetis/overview>
   Parallel graph partitioning

CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:509 (message):
  No graph partitioner found.  SCOTCH, ParMETIS or KaHIP is required.

That makes sense, because we filter out ParMETIS as dependency in EESSI, since we can't include it because of its license.

@gkaf89 @jhale Thoughts on this? Is there a particular reason why you didn't include SCOTCH (and/or KaHIP) as a dependency? Why is ParMETIS recommended over SCOTCH/KaHIP?

jhale · 2025-12-15T15:08:08Z

@boegel Indeed, although Parmetis is our most widely used partitioner dependency (and thus it is 'recommended'), it is not Open Source.

SCOTCH, in honesty, hasn't performed/scaled so well for large runs in my experience, so I'd rather not ship EESSI build against it, unless really necessary. KaHIP is pretty good. What do we have available to build against? As the PR just went in I guess we could make a quick follow up and add something sensible.

bedroge · 2025-12-15T15:57:49Z

@boegel Indeed, although Parmetis is our most widely used partitioner dependency (and thus it is 'recommended'), it is not Open Source.

SCOTCH, in honesty, hasn't performed/scaled so well for large runs in my experience, so I'd rather not ship EESSI build against it, unless really necessary. KaHIP is pretty good. What do we have available to build against? As the PR just went in I guess we could make a quick follow up and add something sensible.

We don't have a KaHIP for foss/2023b in EESSI yet, but it should be easy to add https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs/blob/develop/easybuild/easyconfigs/k/KaHIP/KaHIP-3.16-gompi-2023b.eb (in particular because we already have the same version for 2023a).

jhale · 2025-12-17T14:00:33Z

Should be OK - we will do the PRs immediately in the New Year.

boegel · 2025-12-18T08:18:56Z

see also @gkaf89's PR:

{ai,math}[GCCcore/13.3.0,gompi/2024a] KaHIP v3.17, GKlib-METIS v5.1.1 easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#24656

jhale · 2026-01-05T15:13:26Z

Fixed upstream at easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#25004

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/eessi-2023.06-eb-5.1.2-2023b.yml

bedroge · 2026-01-06T11:19:26Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace

eessi-bot-jsc · 2026-01-06T11:19:33Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2026.01/pr_1340/14342015

date	job status	comment
Jan 06 11:19:31 UTC 2026	submitted	job id `14342015` awaits release by job manager
Jan 06 11:20:30 UTC 2026	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 06 13:02:47 UTC 2026	running	job `14342015` is running
Jan 06 14:05:49 UTC 2026	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14342015.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-17677078200.tar.gz` size: 28 MiB (29525762 bytes) entries: 3401 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace no other files in tarball
Jan 06 14:05:49 UTC 2026	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=gpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1f2ca7c1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 7060.27 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1533.332 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1520.571 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /b22a48f5 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1511.987 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 4.87 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 4.9 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 5.11 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 4.83 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 7.12 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 6.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 8.39 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 8.35 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.51 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.52 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 44338.31 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 42528.18 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (27/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 41241.92 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (28/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 43083.32 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 20/28 test case(s) from 28 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14342015.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2026-01-06T11:24:10Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2

eessi-bot-aws · 2026-01-06T11:24:17Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2026.01/pr_1340/119396

date	job status	comment
Jan 06 11:24:16 UTC 2026	submitted	job id `119396` awaits release by job manager
Jan 06 11:25:09 UTC 2026	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 06 11:30:11 UTC 2026	running	job `119396` is running
Jan 06 13:15:30 UTC 2026	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119396.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17677050930.tar.zst` size: 22 MiB (23665953 bytes) entries: 3401 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Jan 06 13:15:30 UTC 2026	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 426.077 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 433.199 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.77 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.92 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 5.56 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 5.78 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 0.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 0.8 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6416.77 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6443.68 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119396.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

jhale · 2026-01-06T11:49:12Z

Note that the PR includes both Kahip and Parmetis and adds CMake options so that they are strictly required - this is the best solution for Easybuild, but may make difficulties for EESSI. How is/can Parmetis be patched out in EESSI?

bedroge · 2026-01-06T12:29:12Z

Note that the PR includes both Kahip and Parmetis and adds CMake options so that they are strictly required - this is the best solution for Easybuild, but may make difficulties for EESSI. How is/can Parmetis be patched out in EESSI?

Ah, right, then these builds will likely fail. ParMETIS is filtered using EasyBuild's filter dependencies option, that's done in EESSI's EasyBuild configuration here.

We could add a hook in EESSI that removes -DDOLFINX_ENABLE_PARMETIS=ON from configopts, or we could remove that particular flag (only for ParMETIS) from the easyconfig anyway to make it a less strict requirement. With an easyblock you would be able to check this a bit better (i.e. make sure that at least one partitioner is listed as dependency, and otherwise throw an error), but adding one for only this purpose it probably a bit overkill.
@boegel What do you think?

jhale · 2026-01-06T15:28:43Z

I commented the strict requirement on finding Parmetis, not ideal for the standard recipe, but on balance preferable to adding custom code.

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/eessi-2023.06-eb-5.1.2-2023b.yml

bedroge · 2026-01-06T18:50:41Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace

eessi-bot-jsc · 2026-01-06T18:50:48Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2026.01/pr_1340/14343039

date	job status	comment
Jan 06 18:50:46 UTC 2026	submitted	job id `14343039` awaits release by job manager
Jan 06 18:51:42 UTC 2026	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 07 10:57:00 UTC 2026	running	job `14343039` is running
Jan 07 12:02:11 UTC 2026	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14343039.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-17677867500.tar.gz` size: 28 MiB (29536435 bytes) entries: 3401 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace no other files in tarball
Jan 07 12:02:11 UTC 2026	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/28) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=gpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1f2ca7c1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 7021.829 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1518.306 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1549.035 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/28) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /b22a48f5 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: perf: 1499.467 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 4.91 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 4.82 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 5.08 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 5.06 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 7.0 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 7.04 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 8.62 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/28) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 8.63 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.52 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: latency: 0.51 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 41826.5 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 41991.87 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (27/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 41826.13 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (28/28) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64-nvidia-grace+default P: bandwidth: 42430.11 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 20/28 test case(s) from 28 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14343039.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2026-01-07T09:23:00Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2

eessi-bot-aws · 2026-01-07T09:23:07Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2026.01/pr_1340/119669

date	job status	comment
Jan 07 09:23:06 UTC 2026	submitted	job id `119669` awaits release by job manager
Jan 07 09:24:08 UTC 2026	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 07 09:30:11 UTC 2026	running	job `119669` is running
Jan 07 11:14:41 UTC 2026	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119669.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17677841900.tar.zst` size: 22 MiB (23678616 bytes) entries: 3401 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `KaHIP/3.16-gompi-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Jan 07 11:14:41 UTC 2026	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 447.316 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 453.894 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.93 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 5.8 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 5.82 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 1.86 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 0.93 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6411.36 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6409.9 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119669.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

bedroge · 2026-01-07T12:51:36Z

Build failure for FEniCS-DOLFINx/0.9.0-foss-2023b:

/cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/usr/bin/ld: /cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software/spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0/lib/libspdlog.a(spdlog.cpp.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/cvmfs/software.eessi.io/versions/2023.06/compat/linux/x86_64/usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Looks like easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#24400 should fix this. Using EB 5.2.0 instead of 5.1.2 should pick up the new version of this easyconfig. @boegel can you move the builds to the new easystack?

edit: see boegel#35.

move FEniCS-DOLFINx to 5.2.0 easystack

boegel · 2026-01-07T15:50:46Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2

eessi-bot-aws · 2026-01-07T15:50:53Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2026.01/pr_1340/119670

date	job status	comment
Jan 07 15:50:52 UTC 2026	submitted	job id `119670` awaits release by job manager
Jan 07 15:51:07 UTC 2026	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Jan 07 15:57:10 UTC 2026	running	job `119670` is running
Jan 07 17:47:03 UTC 2026	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119670.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.* created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17678078240.tar.zst` size: 20 MiB (21259348 bytes) entries: 3584 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-DOLFINx/0.9.0-foss-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-DOLFINx-Python/0.9.0-foss-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b.lua` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b.lua` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python.lua` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b.lua` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software `FEniCS-Basix/0.9.0-GCC-13.2.0` `FEniCS-Basix-Python/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-DOLFINx/0.9.0-foss-2023b` `FEniCS-DOLFINx-Python/0.9.0-foss-2023b` `FEniCS-FFCx/0.9.0-gfbf-2023b` `FEniCS-ufcx/0.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `FEniCS-UFL/2024.2.0-gfbf-2023b` `nanobind/2.5.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `petsc4py/3.22.5-foss-2023b` `pkgconfig/1.5.5-GCCcore-13.2.0-python` `pugixml/1.14-GCCcore-13.2.0` `robin-map/1.3.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `scikit-build-core/0.10.7-GCCcore-13.2.0` `setuptools/80.9.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` `SLEPc/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `slepc4py/3.22.2-foss-2023b` `spdlog/1.12.0-GCCcore-13.2.0` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 no other files in tarball
Jan 07 17:47:03 UTC 2026	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 260.576 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: perf: 437.11 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.65 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 2.59 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 6.01 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 6.07 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 0.84 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: latency: 0.96 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6421.2 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86-64-zen2+default P: bandwidth: 6379.59 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-119670.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

boegel · 2026-01-07T15:53:32Z

Note that the PR includes both Kahip and Parmetis and adds CMake options so that they are strictly required - this is the best solution for Easybuild, but may make difficulties for EESSI. How is/can Parmetis be patched out in EESSI?

Ah, right, then these builds will likely fail. ParMETIS is filtered using EasyBuild's filter dependencies option, that's done in EESSI's EasyBuild configuration here.

We could add a hook in EESSI that removes -DDOLFINX_ENABLE_PARMETIS=ON from configopts, or we could remove that particular flag (only for ParMETIS) from the easyconfig anyway to make it a less strict requirement. With an easyblock you would be able to check this a bit better (i.e. make sure that at least one partitioner is listed as dependency, and otherwise throw an error), but adding one for only this purpose it probably a bit overkill. @boegel What do you think?

One option could be to only use -DDOLFINX_ENABLE_PARMETIS=ON conditionally in configopts (when ParMETIS is actually a dependency), but that can't really be done easily in the easyconfig file (since the condition would be checked when parsing the easyconfig file, and filtering of dependencies is only done later).

Another option is to update our hooks in EESSI to remove the use of -DDOLFINX_ENABLE_PARMETIS=ON in pre_configure_hook if ParMETIS is not a dependency...

{2023.06}[2023b] FEniCS 0.9.0

960fcc6

boegel added the 2023.06-software.eessi.io 2023.06 version of software.eessi.io label Dec 15, 2025

boegel added the EuroHPC label Dec 15, 2025

jhale mentioned this pull request Jan 5, 2026

{tools}[foss/2023b] FEniCS-DOLFINx v0.9.0 w/ KaHIP. easybuilders/easybuild-easyconfigs#25004

Open

bedroge reviewed Jan 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/eessi-2023.06-eb-5.1.2-2023b.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

bedroge added 2 commits January 6, 2026 12:18

use commit from easyconfig PR 25004

374e9db

Merge branch 'main' into FEniCS

a708628

bedroge reviewed Jan 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

easystacks/software.eessi.io/2023.06/eessi-2023.06-eb-5.1.2-2023b.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

use new commit

2519f12

bedroge and others added 3 commits January 7, 2026 14:42

move FEniCS-DOLFINx-Python-0.9.0-foss-2023b.eb to 5.2.0 easystack

a0bdeb2

remove blank line

b58fb9d

Merge pull request #35 from bedroge/FEniCS

4dd0474

move FEniCS-DOLFINx to 5.2.0 easystack

{2023.06}[2023b] FEniCS 0.9.0 #1340

Are you sure you want to change the base?

{2023.06}[2023b] FEniCS 0.9.0 #1340

Conversation

boegel commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Dec 15, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Dec 15, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Dec 15, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jhale commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Dec 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jhale commented Dec 17, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Dec 18, 2025

Uh oh!

jhale commented Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Jan 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jhale commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

jhale commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Jan 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 7, 2026

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Jan 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 7, 2026

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Jan 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Dec 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Dec 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion bot commented Dec 15, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Jan 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc bot commented Jan 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

bedroge commented Jan 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Jan 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading