Skip to content

Conversation

@jasonhorner
Copy link
Contributor

Clarified URI formats for accessing Azure Data Lake Storage from Fabric and highlighted differences between DFS/ABFS and Blob endpoints.

Clarified URI formats for accessing Azure Data Lake Storage from Fabric and highlighted differences between DFS/ABFS and Blob endpoints.
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonhorner : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit bd843ea:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/t-sql/functions/openrowset-bulk-transact-sql.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards v-dirichards requested a review from Copilot December 9, 2025 21:39
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR clarifies the recommended URI formats for accessing Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 from Fabric, emphasizing the use of DFS/ABFS endpoints over Blob endpoints and explaining the technical differences between them.

Key Changes:

  • Added guidance specifying DFS/ABFS URI formats as the recommended approach for ADLS Gen2 access
  • Documented the technical advantages of DFS/ABFS schemes (HNS support, directory semantics, ACLs)
  • Explained limitations of Blob endpoints when used with ADLS Gen2

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeRayMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Dec 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants