style: format code with Ruff Formatter #27
Conversation
Welcome @deepsource-autofix[bot]! 🎉Great PR! I've analyzed your code changes for:
Ready to see the full review?
Let's make your code even better together! 🚀 |
|
By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR formats the code with Ruff Formatter to fix style issues introduced in a previous commit. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
This PR applies Ruff Formatter to improve code style consistency, primarily focusing on trailing comma removal and line consolidation in test files.
- Removed trailing commas in method chaining for
Fussobjects intests/test_yaml.py - Consolidated multi-line method call into single line in
tests/test_toml.py(lines 47-50) - Changes align with project's Ruff configuration in
pyproject.tomlwhich specifiesskip-magic-trailing-comma = true
💡 (2/5) Greptile learns from your feedback when you react with 👍/👎!
2 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
![codereviewbot-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/309638?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| " was not found. Create it with this content:", | ||
| expected_toml, | ||
| ) | ||
| ).assert_file_contents( | ||
| filename, expected_toml | ||
| ) | ||
| ).assert_file_contents(filename, expected_toml) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function lacks explicit error handling for file operations. When suggesting the creation of a new TOML file with specific contents, it's crucial to handle potential I/O errors that could occur during file writing or reading. This can be addressed by wrapping the file operations in a try-except block and logging or handling the error appropriately to ensure the test does not fail silently.
Recommended Solution:
try:
# File operation
except IOError as e:
# Handle error, possibly rethrow or log| filename, | ||
| SharedViolations.CREATE_FILE_WITH_SUGGESTION.code + TomlPlugin.violation_base_code, | ||
| " was not found. Create it with this content:", | ||
| expected_toml, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of a large string directly within the Fuss object for expected_toml could be optimized. Large strings can be memory-intensive, and their handling could be improved by using a reference to a file or a resource that contains the expected content. This would not only clean up the code by reducing inline content but also potentially improve memory usage and performance.
Recommended Solution:
Consider loading the expected TOML content from a separate file or resource, especially if the content is large or used multiple times across tests.
| - age: 35 | ||
| name: Silly | ||
| """, | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| ).assert_file_contents(filename, datadir / "list-by-hash-expected.yaml") | ||
| project.api_check().assert_violations() | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test function test_objects_are_compared_by_hash_on_list_of_dicts_and_new_ones_are_added uses a hard-coded YAML string within the Fuss object to simulate the expected changes. This approach, while straightforward, can lead to maintenance challenges as the complexity of the YAML content increases. It is recommended to externalize these YAML contents into separate files or fixtures. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the tests, making it easier to manage changes and understand the test context.
Recommended Solution:
Refactor the test to load YAML content from a separate file or a fixture, rather than hard-coding it within the test function.
| age: 27 | ||
| from: Liverpool | ||
| """, | ||
| ), | ||
| ) | ||
| ).assert_file_contents(filename, datadir / "jmes-list-key-expected.yaml") | ||
| project.api_check().assert_violations() | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the function test_maximum_two_level_nesting_on_lists_using_jmes_expression_as_list_key_fails, the use of deeply nested hard-coded YAML strings within the Fuss object can make the test difficult to understand and maintain, especially when dealing with complex data structures. This approach also increases the risk of errors in specifying the YAML structure correctly.
Recommended Solution:
Consider simplifying the structure or using a data-driven approach where the YAML structures are defined in external files or fixtures. This would not only enhance the clarity and maintainability of the test but also reduce the likelihood of errors in the test setup.
This commit fixes the style issues introduced in ca76bc6 according to the output
from Ruff Formatter.
Details: #26
Summary by Sourcery
Chores:
This change is