Skip to content

Conversation

@vlad-activeloop
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 🚀 Pull Request

Impact

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes expected existing functionality)
  • Enhancement/New feature (adds functionality without impacting existing logic)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Description

Things to be aware of

Things to worry about

Additional Context

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR introduces an automated code review workflow using Claude AI that triggers on pull request events and manual invocation through comments.

Changes:

  • Adds a GitHub Actions workflow for automated PR reviews using Claude AI
  • Configures dual trigger mechanism: automatic on PR open (non-draft) and manual via /claude-review comment
  • Integrates with shared workflow from ActiveloopAI organization using 1Password service account

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
name: Claude PR Review
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The workflow name 'Claude PR Review' doesn't match the filename 'pr-review.yaml'. Consider renaming to either make the filename 'claude-pr-review.yaml' or the workflow name 'PR Review' for consistency.

Suggested change
name: Claude PR Review
name: PR Review

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@vlad-activeloop vlad-activeloop merged commit a30897e into main Jan 20, 2026
1 check passed
@vlad-activeloop vlad-activeloop deleted the pr_review branch January 20, 2026 10:18
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants