Skip to content

Conversation

@ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Jan 19, 2026

Self explanatory.

(allow the PR #778 to pass)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Bumped Node.js runtime and package engine from v20.18 to v20.20 across CI workflows and project configuration to ensure consistent build and runtime environments.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 19, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 19, 2026 1:20pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Node.js runtime/version constraints bumped from 20.18 to 20.20 across GitHub Actions workflows and package.json; copilot instruction file updated. No functional logic or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Workflows
.github/workflows/build.yml, .github/workflows/capture-website.yml, .github/workflows/lint.yml, .github/workflows/update-versioned-docs.yml
Updated Setup Node environment node-version values from 20.18 → 20.20 in multiple jobs (build, capture-website, lint, docs).
Repository Metadata & Docs
.github/copilot-instructions.md, package.json
Bumped Node version references: copilot instructions and package.json "engines" constraint changed from ^20.18 → ~20.20.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • amimart

Poem

🐰 I hopped through code with a jaunty spring,

Eighteen to twenty—what joy I bring!
Workflows aligned, package.json too,
A tiny bump, fresh and new,
🥕 Pipelines hum a brighter tune.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: upgrading Node.js from v20.18 to v20.20 across the codebase.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 13-15: The engines.node field in package.json currently uses a
caret range ("node": "^20.20") which permits minor and patch updates within Node
20 (>=20.20.0 <21.0.0); if you intend to restrict to patch updates only for the
20.20 series, change the value to a tilde range ("node": "~20.20") or explicitly
document the intended upgrade policy in the repo (e.g., a README or package.json
comment) so it's clear whether engines.node should allow 20.21/20.22 or only
20.20.x.

@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the build/nodejs-version-upgrade branch from dc6e99b to 1ca2600 Compare January 19, 2026 13:16
Copy link
Member

@bot-anik bot-anik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Device URL
desktop http://localhost:3000/

Device URL
mobile http://localhost:3000/

Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead

@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Jan 19, 2026

@coderabbitai resolve

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved.

@ccamel ccamel merged commit a3f35de into main Jan 19, 2026
18 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the build/nodejs-version-upgrade branch January 19, 2026 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants