feat: support URL sources upload to portal #1235

hanna-skryl · 2026-02-03T01:36:01Z

Part of #677

Upgrades @code-pushup/portal-client to v0.17.0 and adds support for uploading and downloading issues with URL sources.

Additionally, the Axe plugin issue messages are now built from the structured check results (none/all/any arrays) instead of parsing the failureSummary string. This produces cleaner messages and removes the selector prefix workaround that was needed before the portal supported URL sources.

nx-cloud · 2026-02-03T01:37:32Z

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 6fe2ae5

Command	Status	Duration	Result
`nx run ci:code-pushup -- merge-diffs --files=/h...`	✅ Succeeded	5s	View ↗
`nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa...`	✅ Succeeded	1m 31s	View ↗
`nx run-many --targets=code-pushup --parallel=fa...`	✅ Succeeded	12m 57s	View ↗
`nx run-many -t unit-test,int-test`	✅ Succeeded	1m 15s	View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-02-03 14:16:11 UTC

nx-cloud · 2026-02-03T01:37:32Z

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 6c3dff0

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-02-03 01:52:02 UTC

pkg-pr-new · 2026-02-03T01:37:45Z

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1235

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1235

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1235

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1235

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1235

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1235

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1235

commit: 6fe2ae5

github-actions · 2026-02-03T01:46:37Z

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit 8e17838 with previous commit 7b6e72c.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Security	🔴 47	🔴 45
Performance	🔴 33	🔴 34
Documentation	🟡 53	🟡 53
Code coverage	🟢 93	🟢 93
Bug prevention	🟡 75	🟡 75
Axe Accessibility	🟡 88	🟡 88
Code style	🟢 100	🟢 100	–
Updates	🟡 78	🟡 78	–
Type Safety	🟡 67	🟡 67	–
Miscellaneous	🟡 67	🟡 67	–
Accessibility	🟢 92	🟢 92	–
Best Practices	🟢 100	🟢 100	–
SEO	🟢 92	🟢 92	–

👍 3 groups improved, 👎 1 group regressed, 👍 5 audits improved, 👎 4 audits regressed, 16 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score
JS packages	npm audit	🔴 47	🔴 45
Lighthouse	Performance	🔴 33	🔴 34
JSDocs coverage	Documentation coverage	🟡 53	🟡 53
Code coverage	Code coverage metrics	🟢 93	🟢 93

30 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin	🛡️ Audit	📏 Previous value	📏 Current value
Lighthouse	Minify CSS	🟩 0	🟥 Potential savings of 10 KiB
Lighthouse	First Contentful Paint	🟥 3.1 s	🟥 3.4 s
Lighthouse	Total Blocking Time	🟥 3,150 ms	🟥 1,670 ms
Lighthouse	Speed Index	🟥 7.3 s	🟥 7.7 s
JS packages	Vulnerabilities for npm prod dependencies.	🟨 11 vulnerabilities (2 high, 2 moderate, 7 low)	🟨 11 vulnerabilities (2 high, 3 moderate, 6 low)
Lighthouse	Time to Interactive	🟥 14.2 s	🟥 13.9 s
JSDocs coverage	Functions coverage	🟥 585 undocumented functions	🟥 585 undocumented functions
Code coverage	Line coverage	🟩 92.8 %	🟩 92.8 %
Code coverage	Function coverage	🟩 94.4 %	🟩 94.4 %
Lighthouse	Avoids enormous network payloads	🟩 Total size was 2,087 KiB	🟩 Total size was 2,102 KiB
Lighthouse	Minimizes main-thread work	🟥 13.9 s	🟥 10.6 s
Lighthouse	JavaScript execution time	🟥 4.6 s	🟥 3.4 s
Lighthouse	Server Backend Latencies	🟩 640 ms	🟩 1,540 ms
Lighthouse	Largest Contentful Paint	🟥 11.7 s	🟥 12.2 s
Lighthouse	Reduce unused JavaScript	🟥 Potential savings of 225 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 225 KiB
Lighthouse	Metrics	🟩 100%	🟩 100%
Lighthouse	Uses efficient cache policy on static assets	🟨 31 resources found	🟨 31 resources found
Lighthouse	Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles	🟥 Potential savings of 86 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 86 KiB
Lighthouse	Max Potential First Input Delay	🟥 1,190 ms	🟥 1,090 ms
Lighthouse	Reduce unused CSS	🟥 Potential savings of 125 KiB	🟥 Potential savings of 143 KiB
Lighthouse	Network Round Trip Times	🟩 10 ms	🟩 50 ms
Lighthouse	Initial server response time was short	🟥 Root document took 620 ms	🟥 Root document took 600 ms
Lighthouse	ARIA `tooltip` elements have accessible names	🟩 passed	🟩 0
Axe	ARIA hidden element must not be focusable or contain focusable elements	🟩 201 elements	🟩 202 elements
Code coverage	Branch coverage	🟨 89.2 %	🟨 89.2 %

654 other audits are unchanged.

github-actions · 2026-02-03T01:52:13Z

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit 8e17838 with previous commit 7b6e72c.

💼 Project `plugin-axe`

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Documentation	🟡 70	🟡 70
Code coverage	🟢 94	🟢 94

4 other categories are unchanged.

👍 2 groups improved, 👍 3 audits improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
JSDocs coverage	Documentation coverage	🟡 70	🟡 70
Code coverage	Code coverage metrics	🟢 94	🟢 94

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin	🛡️ Audit	📏 Previous value	📏 Current value
JSDocs coverage	Functions coverage	🟨 12 undocumented functions	🟨 12 undocumented functions
Code coverage	Branch coverage	🟩 90 %	🟩 90.3 %
Code coverage	Line coverage	🟨 73 %	🟨 73.2 %

440 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project `core`

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Code coverage	🟢 90	🟢 90

5 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👍 2 audits improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Code coverage	Code coverage metrics	🟢 90	🟢 90

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin	🛡️ Audit	📏 Previous value	📏 Current value	🔄 Value change
Code coverage	Branch coverage	🟨 83.2 %	🟨 83.3 %
Code coverage	Line coverage	🟩 94.8 %	🟩 94.8 %

442 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project `ci`

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Code coverage	🟢 92	🟢 92

5 other categories are unchanged.

👎 1 group regressed, 👍 1 audit improved, 👎 1 audit regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Code coverage	Code coverage metrics	🟢 92	🟢 92

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin	🛡️ Audit	📏 Previous value	📏 Current value	🔄 Value change
Code coverage	Branch coverage	🟨 83.6 %	🟨 83.5 %
Code coverage	Line coverage	🟩 94.8 %	🟩 94.8 %

443 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project `utils`

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
Documentation	🟡 61	🟡 61

5 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin	🗃️ Group	⭐ Previous score	⭐ Current score	🔄 Score change
JSDocs coverage	Documentation coverage	🟡 61	🟡 61

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

All of 444 audits are unchanged.

10 other projects are unchanged.

matejchalk · 2026-02-03T09:50:45Z

packages/plugin-axe/src/lib/runner/transform.ts

+    check => check.message,
+  );
+  if (requiredMessages.length > 0) {
+    return requiredMessages.join('. ');


The unit tests don't cover a case where there are multiple messages in all or none. If it's a realistic case, I would test that checks the messages are joined correctly.

It is a realistic case. Thanks for the pointer!

matejchalk · 2026-02-03T09:51:31Z

packages/plugin-axe/src/lib/runner/transform.ts

+  if (requiredMessages.length > 0) {
+    return requiredMessages.join('. ');
+  }
+  return node.any[0]?.message ?? fallback;


Is it possible that using only the first message in any omits useful information?

I don't think so. The any array contains alternative ways to fix the issue, and the first message is typically the most direct fix. The rest are just fallback options covered by the audit's docs link.

For example, an "Images must have alternative text" audit has only any failures:

Element does not have an alt attribute

aria-label attribute does not exist or is empty

aria-labelledby attribute does not exist, references elements that do not exist or references elements that are empty

Element has no title attribute

Element's default semantics were not overridden with role="none" or role="presentation""

The first message is a compact, actionable fix, and the other alternatives are already mentioned in the audit docs.

Alternatively, a "Links must have discernible text" audit has both none and any failures:

none:

Element is in tab order and does not have accessible text

any:

Element does not have text that is visible to screen readers

aria-label attribute does not exist or is empty

aria-labelledby attribute does not exist, references elements that do not exist or references elements that are empty

Element has no title attribute

The none message is the actual problem.

I also initially thought all the failure messages were useful, but they really aren't.

Also, the Axe audit title and the docs URL usually provide all the necessary context to describe the failure. The issue source seems much more useful than the message. So, there is no need to clutter issue messages with full failure summaries.

hanna-skryl added 2 commits February 2, 2026 20:32

feat(core,ci): support URL sources upload to portal

0279e87

refactor(plugin-axe): use structured check messages

512c0fe

hanna-skryl self-assigned this Feb 3, 2026

github-actions bot added 🔬 testing writing tests 🧩 core 🧩 utils 🛠️ tooling 🧩 ci 🧩 axe-plugin labels Feb 3, 2026

fix(plugin-axe): update e2e snapshot for new message format

6c3dff0

hanna-skryl marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 02:38

hanna-skryl requested a review from matejchalk February 3, 2026 02:38

matejchalk reviewed Feb 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

test(plugin-axe): add coverage for multi-check issues

6fe2ae5

hanna-skryl requested a review from matejchalk February 3, 2026 14:15

feat: support URL sources upload to portal #1235

Are you sure you want to change the base?

feat: support URL sources upload to portal #1235

Uh oh!

Conversation

hanna-skryl commented Feb 3, 2026

Uh oh!

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pkg-pr-new bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code PushUp

🏷️ Categories

🗃️ Groups

🛡️ Audits

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Code PushUp

💼 Project plugin-axe

🗃️ Groups

🛡️ Audits

💼 Project core

🗃️ Groups

🛡️ Audits

💼 Project ci

🗃️ Groups

🛡️ Audits

💼 Project utils

🗃️ Groups

🛡️ Audits

Uh oh!

matejchalk Feb 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-skryl Feb 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

matejchalk Feb 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-skryl Feb 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

hanna-skryl Feb 3, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pkg-pr-new bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

💼 Project `plugin-axe`

💼 Project `core`

💼 Project `ci`

💼 Project `utils`