-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Transport health integration model jibe #119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: transportHealthIntegrationModel_jibe
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Transport health integration model jibe #119
Conversation
…he use case Munich to SILO core (new Java is not support the transfer engine between Java code and Java scripts)
…he use case Munich to SILO core (new Java is not support the transfer engine between Java code and Java scripts)
…he use case Munich to SILO core (new Java is not support the transfer engine between Java code and Java scripts)
…rmation from the synthetic population.
…ary) to get rid of Javascript.
… Brandenburg scenario
Update ci.yml
…s://github.com/msmobility/silo into transportHealthIntegrationModel_jibe_baustelle # Conflicts: # siloCore/src/main/java/de/tum/bgu/msm/data/household/IncomeAdjustment.java
…el_jibe_baustelle Solved Determinism Problem + Added BerlinBrandenburg Boilerplate Scenario
|
Its worth noting, the Cambridge team also haven't yet integrated these changes to siloCore's functions related to household income and moves at the time of writing. We are not simulating relocations for Melbourne, so perhaps the integration of these changes (and the complications involved in resolving the conflicts) are not a priority. But we should discuss at some point with the Cambridge team if they plan to; if integrated on their side, we should also for consistency. |
The upstream MSMobility team at TUM's JIBE SILO branch was updated extensively in July, primarily for German use cases, but also with some modification to SiloCore module ---- so we should merge these changes in to our forked branch.