🧠 Logic Atlas Framework

Logic Atlas is a modular, interoperable framework for modeling complex systems, activities, relationships, and enforcement logic. It is designed to support structured reasoning, tagging, simulation, and diagnostics across digital, policy, and operational domains.

---

📌 What Is Logic Atlas?

Logic Atlas is built from seven core sub-frameworks, each covering a distinct dimension of logic:

Framework	Domain	Core Dimensions	Purpose
Activity Relationship Framework	Activity Modeling	Actor, Action, Object, Target	Structuring agency and directionality
Action Classification Framework	Action Tagging	Movement × Transformation	Tagging verbs/actions in workflows
Resource Typology Framework	Resource Classification	Consumability × Physicality	Tagging and planning resource types
Enforcement Logic Framework	Enforcement Modeling	Scope × Mechanism + Source + Strength	Modeling requirement enforcement
Quantification Schema Framework	Universal Measurement	Length × Width × Height	Measuring entities, activities, flows
Relationship Architecture Framework	Structural Mapping	Hierarchical × Network × System	Mapping influence and flow
Relational Geometry Framework	Spatial Relationships	Unrelated, Adjacent, Intersecting, Nested, Embedded	Diagnosing entity proximity

All frameworks are MECE-aligned, interoperable, and designed for composability.

---

🚀 Getting Started

To begin using Logic Atlas:

1. Explore the sub-frameworks — Each is documented in its own formal .md file.
2. Use tagging logic — Apply movement, transformation, and quantification tags to actions and resources.
3. Model activities — Use the Activity Relationship Framework to structure Actor → Action → Object → Target chains.
4. Apply enforcement — Use the Enforcement Logic Framework to define rules, consequences, and escalation logic.
5. Use spatial reasoning — Apply the Relational Geometry Framework to diagnose containment, adjacency, and overlap.

---

🔗 Integration Map

Logic Atlas frameworks are designed to interconnect. For example:

• The Activity Relationship Framework consumes tags from the Action Classification, Resource Typology, and Quantification Schema frameworks.
• The Enforcement Logic Framework links condition and outcome activities from the activity framework.
• The Relational Geometry Framework overlays spatial logic on resources and activities.
• The Relationship Architecture Framework defines the architecture of flows between entities.

See Meta-Framework Overview (logic-atlas-meta.md) for full integration logic.

---

📄 License

This work is part of the Logic Atlas system and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

“Based on work from the Logic Atlas system by Kelvin Chau, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Available at: https://github.com/kfkchau/logic-atlas”

To view the full license terms, see ./LICENSE.md

---

🧾 Reference & Attribution

© Kelvin Chau, 2025
This work is part of the Logic Atlas Framework.
For attribution, citation, or inquiries, please refer to:
🔗 https://au.linkedin.com/in/kfkchau

---

📚 Documentation Layers

• logic-atlas-meta.md — Meta-framework logic and integration schema
• logic-atlas-plan.md — Documentation strategy and governance
• logic-atlas-glossary.md — Shared definitions and tag meanings
• logic-atlas-changelog.md — Update history across all frameworks

---

🧪 Example Use Cases

• Policy compliance modeling
• Digital sourcing lifecycle analysis
• Spatial diagnostics of resource flows
• Enforcement chain simulation
• Activity tagging and workflow mapping

---

📊 Benchmarking

Logic Atlas has been benchmarked against leading modeling and architecture frameworks including TOGAF, BPMN, ArchiMate, UML, and OPA. It stands out for its MECE enforcement, quantification schema, spatial reasoning, and governance structure.

Compared Frameworks

• TOGAF – The Open Group Architecture Framework
• Zachman Framework
• BPMN – Business Process Model and Notation
• ArchiMate
• UML – Unified Modeling Language
• OPA – Open Policy Agent

Benchmark Comparison Table

Dimension	Logic Atlas	TOGAF	BPMN	ArchiMate	OPA	UML
Modularity	✅ Fully modular sub-frameworks	Partial	Partial	Partial	✅	✅
MECE Compliance	✅ Explicitly enforced	❌	❌	❌	❌	❌
Tagging System	✅ Verb, resource, spatial, enforcement tags	❌	❌	❌	✅	❌
Quantification Logic	✅ Length × Width × Height	❌	❌	❌	❌	❌
Spatial Reasoning	✅ Venn 2.0 logic	❌	❌	❌	❌	❌
Enforcement Modeling	✅ Scope × Mechanism × Source × Strength	❌	❌	❌	✅	❌
Activity Structure	✅ Actor → Action → Object → Target	Partial	✅	Partial	Partial	✅
Integration Schema	✅ Explicit matrix and meta-framework	❌	❌	Partial	Partial	❌

See ./logic-atlas-benchmark.md for the full comparison table and analysis.

---

🛠️ Contributions

Logic Atlas is designed to be extensible. New frameworks, tags, and logic modules can be added using the standard sub-framework format defined in logic-atlas-plan.md.

---

⚠️ Disclaimer

The Logic Atlas framework and its documentation were developed with the assistance of AI tools. While the structure, logic, and content have been carefully designed, some sections may contain errors, inconsistencies, or incomplete logic due to limited manual review.

This release is intended as a working draft and will continue to evolve. Contributions, corrections, and feedback are welcome.

Please treat this version as preliminary and not yet production-certified.

---

© Kelvin Chau, 2025
This work is part of the Logic Atlas Framework.
For attribution, citation, or inquiries, please refer to:
🔗 https://au.linkedin.com/in/kfkchau