Skip to content

What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? A methodological taxonomy showing why most precision tests constrain largely local, reciprocity-even observables within assumed frameworks. Proposes discriminating experiments. TEP Paper 10.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

matthewsmawfield/TEP-EXP

Repository files navigation

What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure?

DOI License: CC BY 4.0

TEP-EXP: Precision Tests of General Relativity

Author: Matthew Lukin Smawfield
Version: v0.1 (Istanbul)
Date: 31 December 2025
Status: Preprint
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18109761 Website: https://mlsmawfield.com/tep/exp/ Paper Series: TEP Series: Paper 10 (Experimental Foundations)

Abstract

Most high-precision tests of general relativity constrain reciprocity-even, largely local observables within single-metric frameworks. This leaves open a specific underdetermination between General Relativity (GR) and a class of two-metric disformal scalar-tensor modifications, exemplified here by the Temporal Equivalence Principle (TEP).

This paper formalizes a measurement taxonomy distinguishing gauge-invariant from convention-dependent observables and identifies five recurring scope limitations in the experimental canon: (1) two-way measurement dominance; (2) local/global conflation; (3) model-dependent calibration; (4) the conformal loophole in multi-messenger constraints; and (5) theory-laden data reduction. These characteristics do not diminish the experimental achievements but indicate that, in many cases, the tests primarily constrain parameter space within assumed frameworks rather than systematically discriminating between alternatives.

Discriminating observables—specifically loop asymmetries and spatial correlations—are proposed, together with experimental configurations capable of resolving the underdetermination. These include large-area triangle holonomy tests (targeting residual synchronization holonomy H_resid), interplanetary closed-loop timing, and matter-wave interferometry.

The TEP Research Program

Paper Repository Title DOI
Paper 1 TEP Temporal Equivalence Principle: Dynamic Time & Emergent Light Speed 10.5281/zenodo.16921911
Paper 2 TEP-GNSS Global Time Echoes: Distance-Structured Correlations in GNSS Clocks 10.5281/zenodo.17127229
Paper 3 TEP-GNSS-II Global Time Echoes: 25-Year Temporal Evolution 10.5281/zenodo.17517141
Paper 4 TEP-GNSS-RINEX Global Time Echoes: Raw RINEX Validation 10.5281/zenodo.17860166
Paper 5 TEP-GL Temporal-Spatial Coupling in Gravitational Lensing 10.5281/zenodo.17982540
Paper 6 TEP-GTE Global Time Echoes: Empirical Validation of TEP 10.5281/zenodo.18004832
Paper 7 TEP-UCD Universal Critical Density 10.5281/zenodo.18064366
Paper 8 TEP-RBH The Soliton Wake 10.5281/zenodo.18059251
Paper 9 TEP-SLR Satellite Laser Ranging Validation 10.5281/zenodo.18064582
Paper 10 TEP-EXP (This repo) What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? 10.5281/zenodo.18109761

Key Arguments

The Circularity Problem

The engineering success of GPS demonstrates self-consistency within the assumed framework. It does not, by itself, establish uniqueness of that framework among alternatives that reproduce the same local observables after the same class of corrections.

The Two-Way Blindness

Almost all precision tests use two-way (round-trip) measurements. These are mathematically insensitive to reciprocity-odd, direction-dependent effects. A convention-independent residual holonomy H_resid requires one-way, direction-reversing closed loops after subtracting modeled GR loop terms.

The Local/Global Conflation

Local tests (e.g., Pound-Rebka, optical clocks) confirm the Einstein Equivalence Principle to extraordinary precision. Agreement at the local level does not, by itself, fix global synchronization structure.

The Conformal Loophole

Multi-messenger constraints such as GW170817 bound differential propagation speed between photons and gravitons, primarily constraining disformal cone tilts. Conformal-sector structure that rescales clock rates without splitting null cones remains comparatively weakly constrained by such common-path tests.

Experiments Examined

Experiment Claimed Result TEP Critique
Hafele-Keating (1971) Confirms time dilation Two-way; does not probe one-way asymmetry
Pound-Rebka (1960) Gravitational redshift Local; TEP predicts identical local result
GPS "works" Proves GR corrections Self-consistent under assumed model
Cassini (2003) PPN γ = 1 to 10⁻⁵ Two-way Shapiro; blind to odd-parity effects
GW170817 c_γ = c_g to 10⁻¹⁵ Constrains disformal only; conformal unconstrained
Gravity Probe B Frame-dragging Measures geodetic precession; consistent with TEP
Resonator MM/KT tests Isotropy to 10⁻¹⁸ Two-way, closed-path; blind to one-way non-reciprocity

Proposed Discriminating Tests

  1. Triangle Holonomy Tests: One-way timing around large-area direction-reversing loops targeting residual synchronization holonomy H_resid
  2. Interplanetary Closed-Loop Timing: AU-scale, direction-reversed loop measurements constructed from one-way time-tagged links
  3. GNSS Correlation Replication: Independent, blinded analysis of raw GNSS data to verify or refute distance-structured correlations suggested by exploratory analyses
  4. Optical Clock Networks: Continental-scale networks using one-way comparisons to probe synchronization structure
  5. Matter-Wave Interferometry: Loop asymmetries in massive particle phase accumulation

File Structure

TEP-EXP/
├── site/                           # Academic manuscript site
│   ├── components/                 # HTML section files
│   ├── public/                     # Static assets
│   └── figures/                    # Generated plots
├── manuscripts/                    # Related manuscripts (PDF)
├── manuscript-tep-exp.md           # Generated manuscript (built from site/components)
└── VERSION.json                    # Version metadata

Building the Site

cd site
npm install
npm run build

The built site will be in site/dist/. The build also regenerates manuscript-tep-exp.md at the repository root.

Citation

@misc{smawfield2025exp,
  title        = {What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure?},
  author       = {Smawfield, Matthew Lukin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.18109761},
  url          = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18109761},
  note         = {Preprint v0.1 (Istanbul)}
}

Open Science Statement

These are working preprints shared in the spirit of open science—all manuscripts, analysis code, and data products are openly available under Creative Commons and MIT licenses to encourage and facilitate replication. Feedback and collaboration are warmly invited and welcome.


Contact: matthewsmawfield@gmail.com
ORCID: 0009-0003-8219-3159

About

What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? A methodological taxonomy showing why most precision tests constrain largely local, reciprocity-even observables within assumed frameworks. Proposes discriminating experiments. TEP Paper 10.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published