Skip to content

Conversation

@inailuig
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #38.

@n-gao

@inailuig inailuig changed the title Pvary part2 shard_map compatibility part 2 Nov 22, 2025
@n-gao
Copy link
Collaborator

n-gao commented Nov 25, 2025

Thanks a lot!!
It looks like the tests are failing, for the lower-bounded tests, the issue is that pvary does not yet exists. Can we make a distinction like before? But the newly added test also does not pass?

@inailuig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@n-gao could you please run the tests again?

@n-gao
Copy link
Collaborator

n-gao commented Nov 25, 2025

The remaining errors seem to be unrelated to this PR. let me have a look

@n-gao
Copy link
Collaborator

n-gao commented Nov 25, 2025

could you rebase? I pushed a fix to main

@inailuig
Copy link
Contributor Author

could you rebase? I pushed a fix to main

done, tests seem to pass now

@n-gao n-gao merged commit 47a0e8d into microsoft:main Nov 25, 2025
10 checks passed
@n-gao
Copy link
Collaborator

n-gao commented Nov 25, 2025

Amazing thanks!

@inailuig inailuig deleted the pvary_part2 branch November 25, 2025 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

forward_laplacian inside of shard_map vma errors when using function with integer power 1

2 participants