[MNT] Update ruff and mypy version, and format files to match latest ruff checks

[satvshr]

Metadata

• Stacks on [MNT] Update .gitignore #1547 (for ignoring .ruff_cache)
• Reference Issue: fixes [MNT] Updating ruff version for pre-commit #1550
• New Tests Added: No
• Documentation Updated: No

Details

What does this PR implement/fix? Explain your changes.

• Updates the ruff version in .pre-commit-config.yaml to 0.14.10
• Runs ruff format . to align the codebase with the formatting rules of the updated Ruff version
• Fixes also added to pass ruff check . checks
• Add noqa tags in places that will end up changing the architecture of the function/class if I try fixing it
• Only changes from my end to the actual code would be changing small things like:
  • the print statements to be compatible with check UP031
  • Changing variable names to _ to be compatible with RUF059

This PR is going to be a bigger one in size but in my opinion, we should be compatible with the latest ruff version and get it over with sooner rather than later.

On a separate note, there are already a significant number of noqa tags in the codebase. We should consider revisiting the architecture of the functions and classes that rely on them to better align with Ruff’s best practices. Where alignment isn’t appropriate, we should at least discuss why those components don’t need to be Ruff-compatible.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 25.35211% with 53 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 56.21%. Comparing base (8672ffb) to head (08885f8).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
openml/config.py	14.28%	6 Missing ⚠️
openml/runs/run.py	14.28%	6 Missing ⚠️
openml/datasets/data_feature.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
openml/runs/functions.py	28.57%	5 Missing ⚠️
openml/utils.py	16.66%	5 Missing ⚠️
openml/datasets/dataset.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
openml/flows/flow.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
openml/flows/functions.py	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
openml/_api_calls.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
openml/evaluations/functions.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 9 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1553      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.71%   56.21%   +3.49%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        4325     4330       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         2280     2434     +154     
+ Misses       2045     1896     -149     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fkiraly]

typo, this should be "don't"

[fkiraly]

Great, thanks.

• please go through the files and check for problems or typos. I marked a few issue above.
• While we are at it, can you also ensure the target version for the checks is 3.10 or higher, so the from __future__ import annotations is not always added by pre-commit?

[fkiraly]

typo, missing comma?

[satvshr]

fixed typos and bumped target version to 3.10 (previously 3.8)

[satvshr]

@fkiraly I also updated the mypy version to python 3.10 (previously 3.8), I know this is out of scope for this PR, but I would have had to made 44 changes if I continued with the older version. Hope that is okay?

[fkiraly]

@satvshr, that is great! I was already wondering where the setting was that kept adding the from __future__ import in precommit.

[fkiraly]

Looks good to me, but perhaps someone else should also look at whether there is anything they spot in the files.